j/msp430-repl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
fc8f8b9622
msp430-repl/sample-asm/valid.asm

281 lines
4.2 KiB
NASM
Raw Normal View History

msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
;© 2023 John Breaux
; examples of valid assembly
;
0.2.0: Feature update and Refactor - Each major module (lexer, parser, assembler) has its own error type - These error types are somewhat interconnected, but their dependency relationships are one-way and well defined - The AST is no longer responsible for assembling itself - The Assembler (assembler::Assembler) will now visit every AST node and accumulate words - Words are assumed to be little-endian. - There are now a set of assembler directives that affect the generated output: - .word <Number>: inserts a single word in the output - .words [<Number>,*]: inserts multiple words in the output - .byte <Number>: Alias for .word - .bytes [<Number>,*]: Alias for .words - .string "String": inserts a null-terminated UTF-8 encoded string - .strings ["String",*]: "" multiple strings - Data is always word-aligned at the moment. - There are now assembler directives that affect the AST during parsing: - .include "path/to/file": Parses the contents of a file directly into the AST - Included files have their own defines, but *share* labels. This is because .defines are a tokenizer construct, and including a file creates a new buffer and tokenizer. - Circular includes are NOT checked for at the moment. It is very easy to exhaust the stack. - General cleanup of several functions, comments, TODOs, etc. - main.rs was moved to make room for upcoming improvements to the UI TODO: - REPL mode is only partially compatible with .define directive - Branching to a label will branch to the data AT the label, not the label itself. I doubt this is correct behavior. - In case br <label> is meant to use the absolute address, I've created a .org directive (currently unimplemented) for specifying the load address of the program.
2023-09-05 06:54:50 +00:00
; testing labels
jmp main
; testing directives
.string "ABA"
.string "ABAB"
.word 0b0101101001011010
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
.words [0xdead 0xbeef 0x0000]
0.2.0: Feature update and Refactor - Each major module (lexer, parser, assembler) has its own error type - These error types are somewhat interconnected, but their dependency relationships are one-way and well defined - The AST is no longer responsible for assembling itself - The Assembler (assembler::Assembler) will now visit every AST node and accumulate words - Words are assumed to be little-endian. - There are now a set of assembler directives that affect the generated output: - .word <Number>: inserts a single word in the output - .words [<Number>,*]: inserts multiple words in the output - .byte <Number>: Alias for .word - .bytes [<Number>,*]: Alias for .words - .string "String": inserts a null-terminated UTF-8 encoded string - .strings ["String",*]: "" multiple strings - Data is always word-aligned at the moment. - There are now assembler directives that affect the AST during parsing: - .include "path/to/file": Parses the contents of a file directly into the AST - Included files have their own defines, but *share* labels. This is because .defines are a tokenizer construct, and including a file creates a new buffer and tokenizer. - Circular includes are NOT checked for at the moment. It is very easy to exhaust the stack. - General cleanup of several functions, comments, TODOs, etc. - main.rs was moved to make room for upcoming improvements to the UI TODO: - REPL mode is only partially compatible with .define directive - Branching to a label will branch to the data AT the label, not the label itself. I doubt this is correct behavior. - In case br <label> is meant to use the absolute address, I've created a .org directive (currently unimplemented) for specifying the load address of the program.
2023-09-05 06:54:50 +00:00
main:
lexer: Overhaul to support token substitution
2023-08-25 08:01:53 +00:00
; testing defines
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
.define asdfgh #0x1000
lexer: Overhaul to support token substitution
2023-08-25 08:01:53 +00:00
.define qwerty @sp+
br asdfgh
mov qwerty, r15
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
_register_mode:
.define numbered r1
mov r0, r1
mov r1, r2
mov r2, r3
mov r3, r4
mov r4, r5
mov r5, r6
mov r6, r7
mov r7, r8
mov r8, r9
mov r9, r10
mov r10, r11
mov r11, r12
mov r12, r13
mov r13, r14
mov r14, r15
.define special r2
mov pc, r15
mov sp, r15
mov sr, r15
mov cg, r15
indirect_mode:
.define numbered r3
mov @r0, r1
mov @r1, r2
;mov @r2, r3
;mov @r3, r4
mov @r4, r5
mov @r5, r6
mov @r6, r7
mov @r7, r8
mov @r8, r9
mov @r9, r10
mov @r10, r11
mov @r11, r12
mov @r12, r13
mov @r13, r14
mov @r14, r15
.define special r4
mov @pc, r15
mov @sp, r15
;mov @sr, r15 ; These are part of encodings for #immediate values [-1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8]
;mov @cg, r15
indirect_pi_mode:
.define numbered r5
;mov @r0+, r1
mov @r1+, r2
;mov @r2+, r3
;mov @r3+, r4
mov @r4+, r5
mov @r5+, r6
mov @r6+, r7
mov @r7+, r8
mov @r8+, r9
mov @r9+, r10
mov @r10+, r11
mov @r11+, r12
mov @r12+, r13
mov @r13+, r14
mov @r14+, r15
.define special r6
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
; mov , r14
; mov @pc+, r15 ; This is a mov-immediate, and may corrupt your output
mov @sp+, r15 ; pop r15
mov @sr+, r15 ; These are part of encodings for #immediate values [-1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8]
mov @cg+, r15
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
indexed_mode:
.define numbered r7
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov.b 0x10(r0), r1
mov 0x10(r1), r2
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
;mov 10(r2), r3 ; Invalid: cannot index relative to sr
;mov 10(r3), r4 ; Invalid: cannot index relative to cg
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov 0x10(r4), r5
mov 0x10(r5), r6
mov 0x10(r6), r7
mov 0x10(r7), r8
mov 0x10(r8), r9
mov 0x10(r9), r10
mov 0x10(r10), r11
mov 0x10(r11), r12
mov 0x10(r12), r13
mov 0x10(r13), r14
mov 0x10(r14), r15
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
.define special r8
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov 0x10(pc), r15
mov 0x10(sp), r15
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
;mov 10(sr), r15 ; These are part of encodings for #immediate values [-1, 0, 1, 2, 4, 8]
;mov 10(cg), r15
_immediate_mode:
.define numbered r9
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov #0xbeef, r0
mov #0xbeef, r1
mov #0xbeef, r2
mov #0xbeef, r3
mov #0xbeef, r4
mov #0xbeef, r5
mov #0xbeef, r6
mov #0xbeef, r7
mov #0xbeef, r8
mov #0xbeef, r9
mov #0xbeef, r10
mov #0xbeef, r11
mov #0xbeef, r12
mov #0xbeef, r13
mov #0xbeef, r14
mov #0xbeef, r15
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
.define special r10
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov #0xbeef, pc
mov #0xbeef, sp
mov #0xbeef, sr
mov #0xbeef, cg
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
0.2.0: Feature update and Refactor - Each major module (lexer, parser, assembler) has its own error type - These error types are somewhat interconnected, but their dependency relationships are one-way and well defined - The AST is no longer responsible for assembling itself - The Assembler (assembler::Assembler) will now visit every AST node and accumulate words - Words are assumed to be little-endian. - There are now a set of assembler directives that affect the generated output: - .word <Number>: inserts a single word in the output - .words [<Number>,*]: inserts multiple words in the output - .byte <Number>: Alias for .word - .bytes [<Number>,*]: Alias for .words - .string "String": inserts a null-terminated UTF-8 encoded string - .strings ["String",*]: "" multiple strings - Data is always word-aligned at the moment. - There are now assembler directives that affect the AST during parsing: - .include "path/to/file": Parses the contents of a file directly into the AST - Included files have their own defines, but *share* labels. This is because .defines are a tokenizer construct, and including a file creates a new buffer and tokenizer. - Circular includes are NOT checked for at the moment. It is very easy to exhaust the stack. - General cleanup of several functions, comments, TODOs, etc. - main.rs was moved to make room for upcoming improvements to the UI TODO: - REPL mode is only partially compatible with .define directive - Branching to a label will branch to the data AT the label, not the label itself. I doubt this is correct behavior. - In case br <label> is meant to use the absolute address, I've created a .org directive (currently unimplemented) for specifying the load address of the program.
2023-09-05 06:54:50 +00:00
jmp _register_mode
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
jmp 0x3fe
jmp -0x3fc
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
ret
; Funky encodings
mov r6, r4
mov @r6, r4
mov @r6+, r4
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov 0x0(r6), r4
mov 0x4141(r6), r4
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #-1, r4
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov #0xffff, r4
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #0, r4
mov #1, r4
mov #2, r4
mov #4, r4
mov #8, r4
mov r6, 0(r4)
mov @r6, 0(r4)
mov @r6+, 0(r4)
mov 0(r6), 0(r4)
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov 0x4141(r6), 0(r4)
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #-1, 0(r4)
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov #0xffff, 0(r4)
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #0, 0(r4)
mov #1, 0(r4)
mov #2, 0(r4)
mov #4, 0(r4)
mov #8, 0(r4)
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov r6, 0x4141(r4)
mov @r6, 0x4141(r4)
mov @r6+, 0x4141(r4)
mov 0(r6), 0x4141(r4)
mov 0x4141(r6), 0x4141(r4)
mov #-1, 0x4141(r4)
mov #0xffff, 0x4141(r4)
mov #0, 0x4141(r4)
mov #1, 0x4141(r4)
mov #2, 0x4141(r4)
mov #4, 0x4141(r4)
mov #8, 0x4141(r4)
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov r6, #0
mov @r6, #0
mov @r6+, #0
mov 0(r6), #0
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov 0x4141(r6), #0
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #-1, #0
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov #0xffff, #0
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #0, #0
mov #1, #0
mov #2, #0
mov #4, #0
mov #8, #0
mov r6, #1
mov @r6, #1
mov @r6+, #1
mov 0(r6), #1
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov 0x4141(r6), #1
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #-1, #1
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
mov #0xffff, #1
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
mov #0, #1
mov #1, #1
mov #2, #1
mov #4, #1
mov #8, #1
; Instruction exercise
; Jumps
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
jne 0x10
jeq 0x10
jlo 0x10
jhs 0x10
jn 0x10
jge 0x10
jl 0x10
jmp 0x10
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
; Two-ops
mov r14, r15
add r14, r15
addc r14, r15
subc r14, r15
sub r14, r15
cmp r14, r15
dadd r14, r15
bit r14, r15
bic r14, r15
bis r14, r15
xor r14, r15
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
and r14, 0x10(r15)
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
; One-ops
rrc r15
swpb r15
rra r15
sxt r15
push r15
call r15
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
; reti is special
reti
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
; Jump aliases
v0.3.0: Total overhaul - Everything has been rewritten - Modularity is improved somewhat - No dependency injection in preprocessor/parser, though - There are now early and late constant evaluation engines - This engine allows for by-value access to already-assembled code - Performs basic math operations, remainder, bitwise logic, bit shifts, negation, and bit inversion - Also allows for indexing into already-generated code using pointer-arithmetic syntax: `*(&main + 10)`. This is subject to change? It's clunky, and only allows word-aligned access. However, this rewrite is taking far too long, so I'll call the bikeshedding here. - Pretty sure this constant evaluation is computationally equivalent to Deadfish?
2024-01-30 11:27:12 +00:00
jnc 0x10
jnz 0x10
jc 0x10
jz 0x10
msp430-asm: init repo with proof-of-concept code
2023-08-20 04:02:24 +00:00
; "emulated" no-op instructions
ret
clrc
setc
clrz
setz
clrn
setn
dint
eint
nop
; "emulated" one-op instructions
br r15
pop r15
rla r15
rlc r15
inv r15
clr r15
tst r15
dec r15
decd r15
inc r15
incd r15
adc r15
dadc r15
sbc r15
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink